Confidential Banking
Selecting an offshore bank is often far more complicated and sensitive than selecting a UK based bank for a UK limited company: In many cases, issues such as the bank’s original nationality, its legal constitution and physical location all play a vital role perhaps not immediately understood by the uninitiated. In addition, where management and nominee services are also selected, issues relating to ultimate beneficial ownership must be addressed and the need for the expert input of a licensed trust and management firm such as our ‘sister’ company SCF Legal & Corporate Management Services Limited becomes essential.
Banking & Confidentiality
In simple terms, it is always better to select a bank which has been
established as an independent subsidiary rather than as a branch of
a 'mother' company since the latter could result in legal exposure in
two jurisdictions rather than one.
For more information on the Banking Systems in the following countries
& jurisdictions, click a link below: |
 |
Banking in Cyprus
When establishing an offshore company or a Branch of a foreign company
in Cyprus details of beneficial ownership must be provided to both the
registration agent and the Central Bank of Cyprus.
However, if nominee directors and shareholders are used no information
need be on public record save that relating to the said nominees. At
the time of registration, personal bank references and passport photocopies
will be required together with details on the type of business activities.
Under local law information appertaining to beneficial owners cannot
be released under threat of penal consequences.
In addition, the accounts submitted to the Central Bank at the end of
the financial year are also strictly confidential. Nevertheless, the
Cypriot authorities will release information. Mere illicit transactions
are involved once the proper procedures have been followed, however,
Cypriot courts will not enforce another country's civil tax claims.
Bank & Jurisdiction Confidentiality Rating:
4 Stars
Bank System Rating: 3-4 Stars
Banking in Gibraltar
Gibraltar has introduced very similar money laundering legislation to
both the Isle of Man and Jersey. However, unlike these two jurisdictions
it is part of the European Union. It has no double taxation treaty network
and gained a very bad reputation in the 1980's due to a number of high
profile scandals.
Non-resident companies are not subject to the same level of due diligence
or monitoring as exempt companies. As with all other respectable European
offshore jurisdictions information will be released if illicit transactions
are claimed.
Most of the recent UK Criminal Justice Act provisions tightening up
money laundering and anti-drug enforcement regulations are currently
being redrafted for local implementation.
Bank & Jurisdiction Confidentiality Rating: 3
Stars
Bank System Rating: 5 Stars
Banking on The Isle of Man
The Isle of Man has one tax treaty partner, the United Kingdom. As with
Guernsey, this treaty allows for an exchange of information relating
not only to fraud but also in respect to the avoidance of taxes covered
by the treaty.
Local company registration agents do not have to keep specific details
on beneficial owners but the likely introduction of a Manx version of
the British Criminal Justice Act will result in a significantly higher
legal 'duty of care' to be placed on bankers and other professionals.
Nevertheless, the fact that banks or company registration agents do
not have to automatically provide beneficial ownership details to the
regulatory bodies means that relatively good confidentiality can be
maintained for most legitimate transactions.
Bank & Jurisdiction Confidentiality Rating: 3
Stars
Bank System Rating: 5 Stars
Banking in Jersey
The regulatory position of Jersey is very similar to Guernsey save that
the information that must be supplied to local company registration
agents will not directly ask for information on a clients UK tax position.
Nevertheless, the exchange of information provisions are almost identical
to those for Guernsey (Art. 1 0, Jersey/UK Double Taxation Treaty, 1952)
and banks are closely monitored.
Synopsis; A highly sophisticated banking and financial service jurisdiction
with a high duty of care on banks to 'know their clients'.
Bank & Jurisdiction Confidentiality Rating: 4
Stars
Bank System Rating: 5 Stars
Banking in Luxembourg
Luxembourg has a highly developed international banking system; with relatively relax regulations, and gaining confidence and reputation from hosting the offices of CEDEL (financial institution specialized in clearing and settlement of Eurobonds) part of the Deutsche Borse which owns the Frankfurt Stock Exchange. Private banking services are also very strong, banking secrecy is highly graded, articles on their Penal Code prevents the disclosure of information to the tax authorities. Recent independent reports and analysis from reputable international financial sources, praised Luxemburg banking systems as an attractive centre for all personal investment business, its cost efficiency, long stability and its tight bank confidentiality.
Bank & Jurisdiction Confidentiality Rating: 5 Stars
Bank System Rating: 5 Stars
Banking in Liechtenstein
For those seeking confidentiality over their business and financial
affairs Liechtenstein probably offers the best 'haven' in Europe. It
is not a member, or associated member, of the European Union and only
has one double taxation treaty with Austria. Under their most recent
banking legislation, passed on the 21ST of October 1992, both present
and former bank staff together with government officials cannot disclose
any banking information to third parties.
If one of the numerous local legal entities, including anstalts, aktiengesellschafts
and foundations, are needed it is highly recommended that local lawyers
are employed since any non-authorized disclosures would result in penal
consequences. For the same reasons, their employment is also recommended
even when personal or foreign company accounts are being opened.
Obviously, Liechtenstein like all other respectable jurisdictions does
not wish, notwithstanding the aforementioned, to be seen as a center
for illicit/criminal activities and, provided sufficient evidence is
adduced, will release information. Further, any cash deposits over 500,000.00
Swiss Francs will be subject to strict source verification.
Nevertheless, it should be noted that the Liechtenstein authorities
will not assist third party inquiries relating to foreign tax obligations.
If a foreign company is opening an account full banking confidentiality
will still apply, however, it is then necessary to consider that jurisdictions
disclosure rules.
Bank & Jurisdiction Confidentiality Rating: 5
Stars
Bank System Rating: 5 Stars
Banking in Switzerland
This is perhaps the most famous banking center in the world and still
continues to attract large numbers of high net worth clients; principally
because of ability and reputation of the banking community.
As in Liechtenstein, cash deposits over 500,000.00 Swiss Francs must
be verified and non-authorized disclosure of confidential information
by bankers and associated officers will result in penal consequences.
Where there is evidence of activities that would be considered criminal
under Swiss law, third parties can seek redress and set-aside the normal
confidentiality.
However, it should be noted that tax avoidance and exchange control
violations are not criminal activities in Switzerland and hence, cannot
compromise standard confidentiality. Further, as a result of pressure
from the United States, it is no longer possible for Swiss lawyers to
open 'Numbered Accounts' under their name for the benefit of undisclosed
clients.
On incorporation, a Swiss company can maintain anonymity by employing
nominees; normally supplied by a local fiduciary company.
In synopsis, Switzerland can provide many benefits to the businessman
and a high level of confidentiality but this must be tempered by relatively
high costs.
Bank & Jurisdiction Confidentiality Rating: 5
Stars
Bank System Rating: 5 Stars